summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/static/index.html
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'static/index.html')
-rw-r--r--static/index.html38
1 files changed, 31 insertions, 7 deletions
diff --git a/static/index.html b/static/index.html
index 077ab27f..d3f1d813 100644
--- a/static/index.html
+++ b/static/index.html
@@ -127,13 +127,37 @@
GrapheneOS, so a huge number of both open and closed source apps are already available
for it.</p>
- <p>Open APIs not tied to Google will continue to be implemented using open source
- providers like the Seedvault backup app. Text-to-speech, voice-to-text, non-GPS-based
- location services, geocoding, accessibility services, etc. are examples of other open
- Android APIs where we need to develop/bundle an implementation based on existing open
- source projects. Compatibility with apps depending on Google APIs / services will be
- improved by implementing them in a way that pretends Google has stopped existing and
- the servers are unavailable.</p>
+ <p>AOSP APIs not tied to Google but that are typically provided via Play services will
+ continue to be implemented using open source providers like the Seedvault backup app.
+ Text-to-speech, voice-to-text, non-GPS-based location services, geocoding,
+ accessibility services, etc. are examples of other open Android APIs where we need to
+ develop/bundle an implementation based on existing open source projects. GrapheneOS is
+ not going to be implementing these via a Google service compatibility layer because
+ these APIs are in no way inherently tied to Google services.</p>
+
+ <p>We're developing support for installing microG as a regular app without any special
+ privileges. This will allow users to choose to use a partial reimplementation of Play
+ services in a specific profile. We won't be supporting arbitrary signature spoofing by
+ microG or any other app since it seriously compromises the OS security model. Guarding
+ it by a permission isn't enough, both because users don't understand the substantial
+ impact on the security model and it weakens security for the verified boot threat
+ model where persistent state such as granted permissions is controlled by an attacker.
+ Instead, the OS will specifically make microG signed with our microG signing key
+ appear to other apps as signed with the Google Play services key. It won't bypass any
+ other signature checks, only a check for Play services, and other apps also won't be
+ able to pretend to be Play services to intercept FCM messages, obtain Google
+ credentials, etc. It will not be granted any privileged permissions or other special
+ capabilities unavailable to a regular untrusted app.</p>
+
+ <p>In the longer term, we also plan to offer a more minimal compatibility layer which
+ pretends that Google services are offline rather than implementing them. Users will
+ have the choice between no implementation of Play services, microG and this minimal
+ implementation not implementing Google services. This choice will be available because
+ we won't be bundling any of this into the OS. Ideally, Google themselves would support
+ installing the official Play services as a regular Android app, rather than taking the
+ monopolistic approach of forcing it to be bundled into the OS in a deeply integrated
+ way with special privileged permissions and capabilities unavailable to other cloud
+ service providers competing with them.</p>
<h2 id="history">
<a href="#history">History</a>