add list of apps banning GrapheneOS via Play Integrity

1 files changed, 25 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/static/articles/attestation-compatibility-guide.html b/static/articles/attestation-compatibility-guide.html
index fe8ff1e8..9c51ba8e 100644
--- a/static/articles/attestation-compatibility-guide.html
+++ b/static/articles/attestation-compatibility-guide.html
@@ -119,6 +119,31 @@
             into the stock OS without a valid security reason. GrapheneOS not only upholds the
             app security model but substantially reinforces it, so it cannot be justified with
             reasoning based on security, anti-fraud, etc.</p>
+
+            <article id="apps-banning-grapheneos">
+                <h2><a href="#apps-banning-grapheneos">Apps banning GrapheneOS</a></h2>
+
+                <p>This is a list of the apps banning GrapheneOS with the Play Integrity API with
+                links to their Play Store pages for leaving feedback:</p>
+
+                <ul>
+                    <li><a href="https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.revolut.revolut">Revolut</a></li>
+                    <li><a href="https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.revolut.business">Revolut Business</a></li>
+                    <li><a href="https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.mcdonalds.app">McDonald's</a></li>
+                    <li><a href="https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.ubercab.driver">Uber Driver: Drive and Deliver</a></li>
+                </ul>
+
+                <p>In addition to leaving feedback for these apps on the Play Store, filing support
+                requests and leaving feedback on third party review sites. Ask them to stop banning
+                GrapheneOS and explain that it's a much more secure OS than what they permit which
+                does not lose any of the standard security model. Explain that they can use the
+                hardware key attestation API to verify that a device is running GrapheneOS to permit
+                it alongside an OS licensing Google apps as they do with the Play Integrity API
+                already. Make sure to push back against false claims that it has something to do
+                with compatibility or security issues. The only reason they aren't permitting it is
+                because we do not license Google Mobile Services (GMS) and these apps are enforcing
+                Google's business interests rather than security.</p>
+            </article>
         </main>
         {% include "footer.html" %}
     </body>