diff options
| author | Daniel Micay <danielmicay@gmail.com> | 2020-07-24 12:18:55 -0400 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Daniel Micay <danielmicay@gmail.com> | 2020-07-24 12:18:55 -0400 |
| commit | 3bca6d5704129e4b02f90d416e57aed1f9b16aa7 (patch) | |
| tree | 19cbbff399fb6fdc817c613a6a06e1f6fcfa1a20 | |
| parent | 27b24277e1dbd456ba68265ed9cc8b7d8c590440 (diff) | |
reword Pixel 4 FAQ
| -rw-r--r-- | static/faq.html | 14 |
1 files changed, 8 insertions, 6 deletions
diff --git a/static/faq.html b/static/faq.html index 352b3308..e4825e44 100644 --- a/static/faq.html +++ b/static/faq.html @@ -168,12 +168,14 @@ <p>Support for the Pixel 4 and Pixel 4 XL is currently experimental, but those along with the upcoming Pixel 4a will become the recommended devices due to longer support - and incremental security improvements for the device support code and firmware. The - Pixel 4a will end up being the device recommended for most people, especially with the - replacement of the fingerprint scanner with IR-based face scanning. We plan to use the - fingerprint scanner to implement 2-factor unlocking, and while it would be possible to - do the same with face unlock we lack the resources to do both, especially since the UX - design would be significantly different.</p> + and incremental security improvements for the device support code and firmware. On the + Pixel 4 and 4 XL, support for fingerprint unlock as a secondary unlock mechanism has + been removed and replaced with IR-based 3D facial scanning. GrapheneOS plans to extend + secondary unlock support with the option of 2-factor authentication using a secondary + PIN or passphrase required for fingerprint / face unlock. It's likely this will be + implemented first for fingerprint unlock, so that's another consideration. The Pixel + 4a will likely have a fingerprint scanner instead of the dual infrared face scanning + cameras.</p> <h3 id="future-devices"> <a href="#future-devices">Which devices will be supported in the future?</a> |
